Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:26s
Smoke thrown on a map
3314.6931
Smoke thrown on a map
3114.6931
Player score (round)
38511011
Player score (round)
42831011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
64%
Nuke
61%
Vertigo
45%
Anubis
28%
Inferno
21%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
11
Nuke
61%
18
9
Vertigo
100%
5
46
Anubis
58%
33
1
Inferno
71%
14
10
Mirage
59%
41
2
Ancient
47%
30
10
Last 5 maps
Dust II
64%
11
0
Nuke
0%
0
8
Vertigo
55%
11
3
Anubis
30%
10
10
Inferno
50%
16
1
Mirage
52%
21
0
Ancient
47%
15
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of B8 vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between B8 and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by B8. The MVP of this match was AW.
B8 analytics
The team B8 secured 35 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for B8 were npl contributed 52 kills and cptkurtka023 contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25005 overall damage.
On the defensive side, B8 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 30 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 56 kills and kAlash contributed 54 kills. 23252 of total damage by DMS could not prevent B8 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments