Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:24s
M4A1 kills on a map
114.3478
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Eco wins full buy
1
AK47 kills on a map
196.5019
Kills on a map
28.416.9373
Damage (avg/round)
149.81871.7
Headshots on a map
16.80.3159
Speed Round (sec)
00:000s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39573
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Nuke
23%
Inferno
21%
Mirage
17%
Anubis
17%
Vertigo
15%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
27
Nuke
62%
29
28
Inferno
64%
14
21
Mirage
45%
20
35
Anubis
70%
37
7
Vertigo
71%
38
1
Ancient
63%
27
9
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
48
Nuke
39%
36
29
Inferno
43%
21
27
Mirage
62%
34
12
Anubis
53%
30
5
Vertigo
56%
32
3
Ancient
61%
28
15
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was rdnzao.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 26 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were rdnzao contributed 33 kills and Koala contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16238 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 20 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were Lucaozy contributed 32 kills and insani contributed 29 kills. 16188 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments