Terminé
1
MIBR
0 - 2
Sharks
Basique

0 Commentaires

Vertigo
10 - 13
Nuke
10 - 13
0 - 0
MIBR Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

32

32

9

0

82

8:4

8

0

Vertigo6.4

6.5

-4%

29

30

11

-1

74

1:7

8

1

Vertigo5.7

5.7

-9%

31

30

10

+1

64

3:6

7

0

Vertigo4.4

5.7

-7%

27

35

10

-8

74

3:8

6

0

Vertigo5.2

5.4

-4%

22

28

8

-6

58

2:4

4

0

Vertigo4.9

5.1

-14%

Total

141

155

48

-14

352

17:29

33

1

Nuke6.1

5.7

-8%

Sharks Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

33

31

12

+2

83

10:3

7

1

Vertigo6.8

7.0

+6%

38

29

16

+9

90

5:1

10

2

Vertigo7

7.0

+11%

32

31

8

+1

65

4:6

7

0

Vertigo7

6.0

-1%

26

28

10

-2

63

6:5

4

0

Vertigo5.6

5.6

-10%

23

23

11

0

51

4:2

2

1

Vertigo5.7

5.5

-10%

Total

152

142

57

+10

353

29:17

30

4

Nuke6

6.2

-1%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
2 - 1
1 - 2
Résultat
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

5.7

6.2

Vertigo1.1

Manches gagnées

20

26

Vertigo3

Éliminations

141

152

Vertigo14

Dégâts

16.19K

16.24K

Vertigo538

Économie

913.2K

971.4K

Vertigo84050

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)

  •  Nuke

00:30s01:24s

Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte

  •  Nuke

114.3478

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Nuke

31.4516

Victoires éco contre achat complet

  •  Nuke

1

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

Mirage

196.5019

Éliminations en moyenne par carte

Mirage

28.416.9373

Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)

Mirage

149.81871.7

Tirs à la tête en moyenne par carte

Mirage

16.80.3159

Round rapide (sec)

Mirage

00:000s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

Mirage

39573

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions
Dust II
Dust II
Interdiction
Mirage
Mirage
Interdiction
Vertigo
Vertigo
Choix
Nuke
Nuke
Choix
Ancient
Ancient
Interdiction
Inferno
Inferno
Interdiction
Anubis
Anubis
Décideur
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Dust II

50%

Nuke

23%

Inferno

21%

Mirage

17%

Anubis

17%

Vertigo

15%

Ancient

2%

Dernières 5 cartes

Dust II

50%

2

27

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Nuke

62%

29

28

p
g
g
g
p

Inferno

64%

14

21

g
p
g
p
p

Mirage

45%

20

35

p
g
p
p
p

Anubis

70%

37

7

g
g
p
g
g

Vertigo

71%

38

1

g
p
p
p
g

Ancient

63%

27

9

p
p
g
p
g

Dernières 5 cartes

Dust II

0%

1

48

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Nuke

39%

36

29

p
g
p
p
p

Inferno

43%

21

27

p
g
g
g
p

Mirage

62%

34

12

g
g
g
g
g

Anubis

53%

30

5

p
p
p
p
p

Vertigo

56%

32

3

g
p
p
p
fb

Ancient

61%

28

15

p
p
g
p
g
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was rdnzao.


Sharks analytics

The team Sharks secured 26 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.


The standout players for Sharks were rdnzao contributed 33 kills and Koala contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16238 overall damage.


On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


MIBR analytics

The team MIBR managed to secure 20 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for MIBR were Lucaozy contributed 32 kills and insani contributed 29 kills. 16188 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory


On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date