0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.12
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
14.64.7
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:27s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4629
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.44
AK47 kills on a map
106.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.825.3
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
51.816.3
Molotov kills on a map
21.0811
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
29%
Mirage
20%
Inferno
15%
Vertigo
11%
Anubis
8%
Nuke
3%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
71%
28
4
Mirage
67%
15
31
Inferno
71%
14
19
Vertigo
76%
29
9
Anubis
70%
23
15
Nuke
70%
23
23
Dust II
50%
2
3
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
67
Mirage
47%
19
17
Inferno
56%
18
26
Vertigo
65%
26
5
Anubis
62%
26
26
Nuke
67%
36
2
Dust II
50%
2
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was drop.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were drop contributed 13 kills and insani contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6805 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
paiN analytics
The team paiN managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for paiN were lux contributed 8 kills and kauez contributed 5 kills. 3170 of total damage by paiN could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments