0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.12
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
14.64.7
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:27s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4629
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.44
AK47 kills on a map
106.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.825.3
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
51.816.3
Molotov kills on a map
21.0811
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
29%
Mirage
20%
Inferno
15%
Vertigo
11%
Anubis
8%
Nuke
3%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
71%
28
4
Mirage
67%
15
31
Inferno
71%
14
19
Vertigo
76%
29
9
Anubis
70%
23
15
Nuke
70%
23
23
Dust II
50%
2
3
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
67
Mirage
47%
19
17
Inferno
56%
18
26
Vertigo
65%
26
5
Anubis
62%
26
26
Nuke
67%
36
2
Dust II
50%
2
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was drop.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were drop contributed 13 kills and insani contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6805 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
paiN analytics
The team paiN managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for paiN were lux contributed 8 kills and kauez contributed 5 kills. 3170 of total damage by paiN could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments