MIBR Scoreboard

+/-

MAPS SCORE

27

29

2

-2

67

5:2

9

0

Vertigo5.2

5.8

0%

19

31

3

-12

73

5:5

3

0

Vertigo5.3

5.4

0%

16

32

8

-16

74

6:8

1

0

Vertigo5.4

5.1

0%

16

30

3

-14

50

0:6

5

0

Vertigo4.6

4.3

0%

8

33

7

-25

42

0:1

0

0

Vertigo3.4

3.7

0%

Total

86

155

23

-69

307

16:22

18

0

Vertigo4.8

4.8

0%

G2 Scoreboard

+/-

MAPS SCORE

MVP

41

15

5

+26

101

6:1

10

0

Vertigo8.8

8.4

0%

35

19

7

+16

85

8:5

13

1

Vertigo6.6

7.4

0%

27

13

12

+14

77

3:2

5

0

Vertigo6.4

6.9

0%

31

19

5

+12

81

3:4

10

0

Vertigo6.9

6.8

0%

18

23

10

-5

71

2:4

4

0

Vertigo5.9

5.5

0%

Total

152

89

39

+63

414

22:16

42

1

Vertigo6.9

7.0

0%

SkinClub Worldwide
Teams advantage

There are currently no games data
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Picks & bans
Nuke
Nuke
ban
Overpass
Overpass
ban
Vertigo
Vertigo
pick
Inferno
Inferno
pick
Dust II
Dust II
ban
Train
Train
ban
Mirage
Mirage
decider
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months

Dust II

50%

Vertigo

50%

Inferno

25%

Overpass

0%

Nuke

0%

Train

0%

Mirage

0%

Last 5 maps

Dust II

50%

2

1

w
l

Vertigo

50%

2

0

w

Inferno

25%

4

0

w
l
l

Overpass

0%

0

1

Nuke

0%

0

4

fb
fb
fb

Train

100%

1

0

w

Mirage

0%

0

2

Last 5 maps

Dust II

100%

1

0

w

Vertigo

100%

1

0

Inferno

50%

2

2

l

Overpass

0%

0

4

fb
fb
fb

Nuke

0%

1

1

l

Train

100%

2

1

w
w

Mirage

0%

3

0

l
l
l
Last results
Head to head
The teams have not met in the last 6 months
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between MIBR and G2, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by G2. The MVP of this match was nexa.


G2 analytics

The team G2 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.


The standout players for G2 were nexa contributed 41 kills and huNter- contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15750 overall damage.


On the defensive side, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


MIBR analytics

The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for MIBR were kNgV- contributed 27 kills and fer contributed 19 kills. 11694 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent G2 from securing the victory


On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date