0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
62
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
Player score (round)
50771012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Plant at last second
02:15s
M4A1 kills on a map
104.6963
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
35%
Overpass
33%
Vertigo
21%
Ancient
17%
Dust II
15%
Mirage
14%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
30%
10
9
Overpass
33%
6
2
Vertigo
50%
4
9
Ancient
50%
8
2
Dust II
71%
7
7
Mirage
43%
7
17
Nuke
36%
11
8
Last 5 maps
Inferno
65%
17
4
Overpass
0%
0
36
Vertigo
29%
7
11
Ancient
67%
6
12
Dust II
56%
9
8
Mirage
57%
23
0
Nuke
38%
13
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and G2, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by G2. The MVP of this match was NiKo.
G2 analytics
The team G2 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for G2 were NiKo contributed 42 kills and m0NESY contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18178 overall damage.
On the defensive side, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were brnz4n contributed 24 kills and Tuurtle contributed 26 kills. 14311 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent G2 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments