MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

17

6

0

63

4:2

4

0

6.0

-8%

16

16

5

0

78

2:6

3

1

5.9

+3%

16

15

6

+1

67

1:3

5

1

5.8

-5%

15

19

5

-4

66

3:4

2

0

5.6

-19%

14

22

2

-8

53

0:3

3

0

5.0

-23%

Total

78

89

24

-11

326

10:18

17

2

5.6

-10%

Bounty Hunters Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

16

6

+10

99

6:4

8

1

7.5

+20%

19

18

6

+1

85

5:2

6

0

6.7

+12%

16

16

4

0

67

4:1

4

0

5.9

-1%

14

14

5

0

58

2:0

1

0

5.7

+4%

12

15

4

-3

55

1:3

1

0

5.0

-16%

Total

87

79

25

+8

363

18:10

20

1

6.2

+4%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Bounty Hunters by the Bo3.gg Team

Bounty Hunters on Anubis Analysis

Bounty Hunters demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Bounty Hunters on Anubis were piriajr, who contributed 26 kills, and SHOOWTiME, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10170 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Bounty Hunters held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis included saffee, who contributed 17 kills, and drop, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9132 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent Bounty Hunters from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date