Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
15.63.4
USP kills on a map
41.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
18.74.8
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.5022
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
12.13.6
USP kills on a map
31.6027
Player score (round)
41741010
Damage (total/round)
43673
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Vertigo
34%
Anubis
17%
Inferno
16%
Nuke
14%
Mirage
4%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Vertigo
77%
26
1
Anubis
56%
9
44
Inferno
64%
25
12
Nuke
14%
7
28
Mirage
62%
34
1
Ancient
59%
27
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
3
8
Vertigo
43%
23
8
Anubis
39%
18
19
Inferno
48%
25
4
Nuke
0%
1
38
Mirage
58%
43
0
Ancient
61%
33
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Metizport vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Metizport and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by Metizport. The MVP of this match was Plopski.
Metizport analytics
The team Metizport secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Metizport were Plopski contributed 58 kills and Adamb contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28829 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Metizport held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were AZUWU contributed 60 kills and CRUC1AL contributed 58 kills. 27466 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent Metizport from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments