0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:23s
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.76
Decoy grenades thrown
31.2597
USP kills on a map
41.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
17.14.9
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.32
Eco wins full buy
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
69%
Mirage
58%
Anubis
26%
Dust II
14%
Vertigo
14%
Inferno
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
2
Anubis
50%
2
1
Dust II
0%
0
4
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Ancient
31%
13
7
Mirage
42%
12
14
Anubis
24%
21
7
Dust II
14%
7
19
Vertigo
14%
7
3
Inferno
0%
0
33
Nuke
0%
4
11
Info
Match analysis of Marsborne vs LAG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Marsborne and LAG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Marsborne. The MVP of this match was Minus.
Marsborne analytics
The team Marsborne secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Marsborne were Minus contributed 25 kills and motm contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9110 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Marsborne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LAG analytics
The team LAG managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LAG were weeza contributed 19 kills and experative contributed 19 kills. 8374 of total damage by LAG could not prevent Marsborne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LAG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments