0 Comments
112
70
32
+42
420
14:14
30
0
+19%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
AK47 kills on a map
186.732
Deagle kills on a map
71.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
18.25.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
HE kills on a map
31.127
HE damage (avg/round)
19.13.4
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Damage (total/round)
40573
Damage (total/round)
38973
Info
Map Analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs Astralis Talent by the Bo3.gg Team
Lyngby Vikings on Inferno Analysis
Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Inferno were Daffu, who contributed 30 kills, and maNkz, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11749 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Astralis Talent on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis Talent, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Astralis Talent on Inferno included void, who contributed 18 kills, and vigg0, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8319 total damage, Astralis Talent couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis Talent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments