0 Comments
365
308
68
+57
410
43:53
87
9
Nuke6.6
+9%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
65%
Inferno
52%
Dust II
30%
Nuke
19%
Vertigo
6%
Ancient
3%
Mirage
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
65%
17
10
Inferno
100%
1
36
Dust II
35%
20
15
Nuke
67%
48
6
Vertigo
53%
19
12
Ancient
64%
28
0
Mirage
51%
35
2
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
37
Inferno
48%
25
4
Dust II
65%
46
3
Nuke
48%
40
2
Vertigo
47%
15
16
Ancient
67%
21
6
Mirage
51%
37
8
Anubis
0%
0
3
Last results
Past matches
- wlwwl
- wwlww
Info
Match analysis of los kogutos vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between los kogutos and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 3-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by los kogutos. The MVP of this match was tomiko.
los kogutos analytics
The team los kogutos secured 96 out of 96 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for los kogutos were tomiko contributed 103 kills and darchevile contributed 75 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 39255 overall damage.
On the defensive side, los kogutos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 47 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 0 out of 96 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 82 kills and BTN contributed 62 kills. 35528 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent los kogutos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments