0 Comments
92
91
38
+1
377
12:15
22
4
Inferno6.3
-2%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
75%
Vertigo
73%
Dust II
62%
Inferno
60%
Overpass
50%
Mirage
33%
Nuke
14%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
24
0
Vertigo
27%
11
9
Dust II
38%
13
10
Inferno
100%
1
28
Overpass
50%
10
9
Mirage
67%
24
1
Nuke
64%
28
6
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Inferno
40%
5
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
2
0
Nuke
50%
4
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- lwwlw
Info
Match analysis of los kogutos vs Forsaken by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between los kogutos and Forsaken, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by los kogutos. The MVP of this match was maaryy.
los kogutos analytics
The team los kogutos secured 27 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for los kogutos were maaryy contributed 30 kills and Enzo contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10174 overall damage.
On the defensive side, los kogutos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Forsaken analytics
The team Forsaken managed to secure 0 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Forsaken were MTZ contributed 20 kills and MWLKY contributed 21 kills. 10806 of total damage by Forsaken could not prevent los kogutos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Forsaken struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments