0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Assists on a map
10.084.4098
Player score (round)
35831011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36171011
Player score (round)
40331011
Damage (total/round)
42473
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Inferno
0%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llll
Info
Match analysis of LOG vs Denial(us) by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOG and Denial(us), a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Denial(us). The MVP of this match was mertz.
Denial(us) analytics
The team Denial(us) secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Denial(us) were mertz contributed 18 kills and INSPIRE contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6661 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Denial(us) held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOG analytics
The team LOG managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOG were gbs contributed 15 kills and v1ze contributed 12 kills. 5915 of total damage by LOG could not prevent Denial(us) from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments