0 Comments
70
30
18
+40
446
10:6
16
1
Nuke7.2
+31%
Teams advantage
Score
4.5
7.2
Nuke2.7
Win Rounds
3
13
Nuke10
Kills
30
70
Nuke40
Damage
3.92K
7.13K
Nuke3216
Economy
243.7K
376.75K
Nuke133050
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
Percentage of headshots
53%15%
Kills on a map
22.0817.1703
Damage (avg/round)
150.21897.4
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
71%
Mirage
60%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
50%
Anubis
34%
Nuke
25%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
71%
7
1
Mirage
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Ancient
0%
3
1
Anubis
38%
13
1
Nuke
25%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
14
Mirage
60%
5
3
Vertigo
50%
8
1
Ancient
50%
20
3
Anubis
72%
18
0
Nuke
50%
10
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of LOADING vs VP.Prodigy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and VP.Prodigy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by VP.Prodigy. The MVP of this match was XdENiSZERA.
VP.Prodigy analytics
The team VP.Prodigy secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy were XdENiSZERA contributed 22 kills and KusMe contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7131 overall damage.
On the defensive side, VP.Prodigy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOADING were HippoV contributed 9 kills and DEVIL contributed 9 kills. 3915 of total damage by LOADING could not prevent VP.Prodigy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments