0 Comments
110
98
39
+12
389
13:17
28
0
Anubis6.3
+19%
Teams advantage
Score
6
6.3
Anubis0.3
Win Rounds
14
16
Anubis2
Kills
98
110
Anubis12
Damage
10.63K
11.68K
Anubis1047
Economy
654.55K
713.6K
Anubis59050
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- —
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
75%
Vertigo
67%
Overpass
L
50%
Nuke
L
50%
Anubis
25%
Inferno
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
4
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Overpass
0%
1
1
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
25%
4
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lww
- wwwlw
Info
Match analysis of LOADING vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOADING and CYBERSHOKE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by CYBERSHOKE. The MVP of this match was Fen2k.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were Fen2k contributed 29 kills and FenomeN contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11680 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOADING were AMANEK contributed 24 kills and devoduvek contributed 23 kills. 10633 of total damage by LOADING could not prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments