0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Player score (round)
36541011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Ancient
29%
Vertigo
19%
Anubis
5%
Inferno
2%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
34%
32
0
Vertigo
67%
6
3
Anubis
48%
23
1
Inferno
50%
2
9
Nuke
0%
3
7
Mirage
58%
26
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
1
Ancient
63%
40
3
Vertigo
48%
21
8
Anubis
53%
15
20
Inferno
48%
21
8
Nuke
0%
1
35
Mirage
58%
31
1
Info
Match analysis of Lilmix vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lilmix and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Lilmix. The MVP of this match was ZYYX.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lilmix were ZYYX contributed 21 kills and dex contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7566 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lilmix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were AZUWU contributed 19 kills and MiGHTYMAX contributed 18 kills. 9622 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent Lilmix from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments