0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
94.3478
Galil kills on a map
51.8168
Assists on a map
10.034.4746
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
38873
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Inferno
61%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
39%
Mirage
34%
Anubis
15%
Nuke
10%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
1
Inferno
17%
6
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Ancient
20%
5
2
Mirage
33%
3
0
Anubis
50%
8
1
Nuke
67%
6
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
20
Inferno
78%
9
3
Dust II
0%
4
3
Ancient
59%
17
3
Mirage
67%
12
4
Anubis
35%
17
3
Nuke
57%
7
9
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- wwwww
Info
Match analysis of Lazer Cats vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lazer Cats and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was Rainwaker.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were Rainwaker contributed 15 kills and Oxygen contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7365 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lazer Cats analytics
The team Lazer Cats managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lazer Cats were Magic888 contributed 10 kills and 7oX1C contributed 11 kills. 4652 of total damage by Lazer Cats could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments