0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Inferno
61%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
39%
Mirage
34%
Anubis
15%
Nuke
10%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
1
Inferno
17%
6
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Ancient
20%
5
2
Mirage
33%
3
0
Anubis
50%
8
1
Nuke
67%
6
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
20
Inferno
78%
9
3
Dust II
0%
4
3
Ancient
59%
17
3
Mirage
67%
12
4
Anubis
35%
17
3
Nuke
57%
7
9
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlllw
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Lazer Cats vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
500 on Anubis Analysis
500 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for 500 on Anubis were Rainwaker, who contributed 15 kills, and Oxygen, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7365 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lazer Cats on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Lazer Cats, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lazer Cats on Anubis included Magic888, who contributed 10 kills, and 7oX1C, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4652 total damage, Lazer Cats couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments