0 Comments
72
61
17
+11
389
10:10
17
1
+7%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
65%
Mirage
46%
Ancient
40%
Vertigo
29%
Inferno
16%
Anubis
10%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
9
Mirage
0%
2
3
Ancient
40%
10
1
Vertigo
25%
4
5
Inferno
29%
7
2
Anubis
60%
10
0
Nuke
55%
11
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
35%
26
29
Mirage
46%
41
6
Ancient
0%
0
65
Vertigo
54%
24
27
Inferno
45%
29
6
Anubis
70%
40
1
Nuke
59%
39
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of L&G vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were simke, who contributed 17 kills, and brutmonster, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7775 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
L&G on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for L&G, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for L&G on Anubis included Malkiss, who contributed 18 kills, and j3kie, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6870 total damage, L&G couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments