0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.5986
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Assists on a map
94.4746
Assists on a map
94.4746
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Player score (round)
35241010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
59%
Inferno
44%
Anubis
25%
Dust II
24%
Ancient
13%
Mirage
9%
Vertigo
6%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
7
Inferno
44%
18
3
Anubis
52%
33
0
Dust II
65%
17
2
Ancient
64%
39
0
Mirage
50%
18
3
Vertigo
56%
9
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
41%
32
6
Inferno
0%
1
30
Anubis
77%
52
2
Dust II
41%
22
10
Ancient
51%
49
5
Mirage
59%
41
2
Vertigo
50%
18
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Leo vs UNiTY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Leo and UNiTY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Leo. The MVP of this match was marat2k.
Leo analytics
The team Leo secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Leo were marat2k contributed 19 kills and OneUn1que contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7773 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Leo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
UNiTY analytics
The team UNiTY managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for UNiTY were Levi contributed 10 kills and K1-FiDa contributed 11 kills. 5486 of total damage by UNiTY could not prevent Leo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, UNiTY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments