Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Player score (round)
37761012
Player score (round)
37801012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Plant at last second
02:15s
Player score (round)
35571012
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
35201012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
33%
Vertigo
29%
Nuke
24%
Ancient
10%
Mirage
7%
Dust II
6%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
33%
3
2
Vertigo
33%
3
2
Nuke
80%
5
0
Ancient
40%
5
1
Mirage
67%
6
0
Dust II
33%
3
3
Inferno
60%
10
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
22
Vertigo
62%
13
9
Nuke
56%
16
5
Ancient
50%
6
9
Mirage
60%
20
2
Dust II
39%
18
3
Inferno
57%
28
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of KTRL vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KTRL and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by KTRL. The MVP of this match was BTN.
KTRL analytics
The team KTRL secured 37 out of 74 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KTRL were dEE contributed 62 kills and sXe contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28052 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KTRL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 37 out of 74 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were BTN contributed 71 kills and ragga contributed 47 kills. 27490 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent KTRL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments