Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deaths on a map
018
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
37841012
Shots (total/round)
8316
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35881012
Player score (round)
35371012
Damage (total/round)
41373
Player score (round)
42791012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
40%
Vertigo
38%
Overpass
33%
Mirage
20%
Ancient
10%
Inferno
9%
Dust II
6%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
15
5
Vertigo
62%
13
9
Overpass
0%
1
21
Mirage
60%
20
1
Ancient
40%
5
9
Inferno
59%
27
4
Dust II
39%
18
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
3
0
Vertigo
100%
1
1
Overpass
33%
3
0
Mirage
80%
5
0
Ancient
50%
4
1
Inferno
50%
8
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Info
Match analysis of Nexus vs KTRL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nexus and KTRL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by KTRL. The MVP of this match was ragga.
KTRL analytics
The team KTRL secured 37 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KTRL were sarenii contributed 50 kills and ADRON contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25311 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KTRL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 31 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were ragga contributed 57 kills and BTN contributed 53 kills. 24408 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent KTRL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments