0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:26s
HE kills on a map
21.1227
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
USP kills on a map
51.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
22.24.7
Shots (total/round)
8816
Damage (total/round)
40173
Player score (round)
35231011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Ancient
47%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
21%
Vertigo
16%
Nuke
14%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
24
Ancient
67%
9
1
Inferno
33%
3
9
Anubis
29%
7
12
Vertigo
29%
7
6
Nuke
0%
5
15
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
10
6
Ancient
20%
5
13
Inferno
0%
2
12
Anubis
50%
2
22
Vertigo
13%
8
3
Nuke
14%
7
9
Info
Match analysis of KZG vs DXA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KZG and DXA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by KZG. The MVP of this match was KZXL.
KZG analytics
The team KZG secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KZG were KZXL contributed 23 kills and Mingovi contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8667 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KZG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DXA analytics
The team DXA managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DXA were Kiyoshi contributed 16 kills and Roflko contributed 13 kills. 7311 of total damage by DXA could not prevent KZG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DXA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments