0 Comments
176
139
29
+37
384
28:21
45
0
Mirage6.4
+10%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
46%
Vertigo
40%
Inferno
36%
Anubis
16%
Nuke
14%
Mirage
4%
Overpass
1%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
46%
26
8
Vertigo
0%
0
53
Inferno
20%
35
12
Anubis
50%
16
9
Nuke
39%
23
4
Mirage
58%
43
2
Overpass
42%
12
32
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
52
Vertigo
40%
20
28
Inferno
56%
34
6
Anubis
66%
32
3
Nuke
53%
40
3
Mirage
54%
37
3
Overpass
41%
22
12
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwww
- wwlwl
Info
Match analysis of JANO vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between JANO and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was simke.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were simke contributed 39 kills and nEMANHA contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18771 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
JANO analytics
The team JANO managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for JANO were Jelo contributed 36 kills and Sm1llee contributed 30 kills. 15603 of total damage by JANO could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, JANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments