0 Comments
264
248
53
+16
375
40:35
68
9
Inferno6.2
+4%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
44%
Vertigo
40%
Inferno
38%
Nuke
16%
Anubis
16%
Overpass
15%
Mirage
5%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
44%
25
8
Vertigo
0%
0
50
Inferno
18%
34
11
Nuke
35%
20
3
Anubis
50%
14
9
Overpass
30%
10
31
Mirage
59%
41
2
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
48
Vertigo
40%
20
25
Inferno
56%
32
6
Nuke
51%
37
3
Anubis
66%
29
3
Overpass
45%
20
11
Mirage
54%
35
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of JANO vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between JANO and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was allu.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 41 out of 75 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 60 kills and Cjoffo contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28019 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
JANO analytics
The team JANO managed to secure 34 out of 75 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for JANO were allu contributed 68 kills and Jelo contributed 56 kills. 27125 of total damage by JANO could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, JANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments