Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
11.52
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
34791012
Player score (round)
36141012
Player score (round)
45081012
Player score (round)
37091012
Player score (round)
39171012
Shots (total/round)
9416
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
76%
Overpass
59%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
19%
Ancient
19%
Dust II
9%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
38
Overpass
59%
17
2
Mirage
50%
10
14
Nuke
60%
25
5
Ancient
62%
13
8
Dust II
73%
11
12
Inferno
65%
17
11
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
76%
17
0
Overpass
0%
3
15
Mirage
0%
0
27
Nuke
41%
22
5
Ancient
43%
21
3
Dust II
64%
11
18
Inferno
64%
25
5
Info
Match analysis of Isurus vs FTW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Isurus and FTW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was Ag1L.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 41 out of 70 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were Gafolo contributed 54 kills and deco contributed 59 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27827 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 30 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FTW analytics
The team FTW managed to secure 29 out of 70 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FTW were Ag1L contributed 56 kills and ewjerkz contributed 46 kills. 26006 of total damage by FTW could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments