Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
21.25.4
AWP kills on a map
226.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
68.821.6
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
20.15.4
Damage (total/round)
38273
Player score (round)
45301012
Player score (round)
35101012
Damage (total/round)
44673
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
75%
Dust II
54%
Nuke
54%
Mirage
42%
Inferno
17%
Vertigo
17%
Overpass
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
4
4
Dust II
71%
17
0
Nuke
0%
0
16
Mirage
38%
8
3
Inferno
50%
10
0
Vertigo
17%
6
6
Overpass
10%
10
7
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
2
Dust II
17%
6
1
Nuke
54%
13
0
Mirage
80%
5
2
Inferno
67%
3
6
Vertigo
0%
1
10
Overpass
14%
7
1
Info
Match analysis of INTZ vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between INTZ and SWS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by SWS. The MVP of this match was Gafolo.
SWS analytics
The team SWS secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SWS were Gafolo contributed 36 kills and matios contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12268 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SWS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
INTZ analytics
The team INTZ managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for INTZ were DANVIET contributed 28 kills and paiva contributed 21 kills. 11369 of total damage by INTZ could not prevent SWS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, INTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments