0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
31.8171
Trades on a map
7.043.4638
Player score (round)
35801011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Ancient
28%
Vertigo
22%
Nuke
19%
Anubis
7%
Mirage
4%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
32
Ancient
61%
23
10
Vertigo
53%
15
6
Nuke
52%
21
3
Anubis
60%
30
1
Mirage
47%
15
9
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
3
Ancient
33%
9
0
Vertigo
75%
4
2
Nuke
33%
3
1
Anubis
53%
17
0
Mirage
43%
7
1
Dust II
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of Insilio vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Insilio and CYBERSHOKE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Insilio. The MVP of this match was FpSSS.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Insilio were FpSSS contributed 14 kills and Pipw contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6939 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were FenomeN contributed 11 kills and kelieN contributed 11 kills. 5368 of total damage by CYBERSHOKE could not prevent Insilio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments