Mirage
15 - 19
Vertigo
13 - 11
Anubis
13 - 8
Imperial Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

13

8

+4

92

4:1

7

1

7.0

+10%

16

10

1

+6

61

0:1

5

1

6.2

+2%

12

12

7

0

82

2:5

3

0

6.0

-1%

13

11

5

+2

64

2:1

4

0

5.8

-7%

13

14

3

-1

72

2:3

4

0

5.7

0%

Total

71

60

24

+11

369

10:11

23

2

6.1

+1%

Solid Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

13

2

+3

68

4:2

4

1

6.7

+9%

14

16

6

-2

84

3:2

3

0

6.2

-6%

14

13

2

+1

73

0:2

3

1

5.9

+1%

9

14

6

-5

56

3:2

3

0

5.0

-19%

7

15

3

-8

43

1:2

2

0

4.2

-32%

Total

60

71

19

-11

324

11:10

15

2

5.6

-10%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Imperial vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team

Imperial on Anubis Analysis

Imperial demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Imperial on Anubis were felps, who contributed 17 kills, and Decenty, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7753 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Imperial held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Solid on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Solid, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Solid on Anubis included CSO, who contributed 16 kills, and gbb, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6805 total damage, Solid couldn't prevent Imperial from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date