Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.85.8
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.616.3
Galil kills on a map
41.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.8
Galil kills on a map
71.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
25.55.8
Player score (round)
38571011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Dust II
25%
Mirage
24%
Vertigo
14%
Nuke
10%
Anubis
7%
Inferno
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
72
Dust II
50%
4
0
Mirage
71%
35
7
Vertigo
53%
15
37
Nuke
58%
38
17
Anubis
62%
34
15
Inferno
60%
25
25
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
70
Dust II
75%
4
8
Mirage
47%
17
22
Vertigo
67%
30
5
Nuke
68%
40
2
Anubis
69%
29
26
Inferno
64%
22
25
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Imperial vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Imperial and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by paiN. The MVP of this match was HEN1.
paiN analytics
The team paiN secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for paiN were Snow contributed 54 kills and kauez contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23489 overall damage.
On the defensive side, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Imperial were HEN1 contributed 50 kills and felps contributed 46 kills. 25060 of total damage by Imperial could not prevent paiN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Imperial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments