0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
153
USP damage (avg/round)
154.6
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.65.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:12s00:39s
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
65.116.7
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
M4A1 kills on a map
184.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
107.616.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.13.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
90%
Nuke
27%
Mirage
21%
Dust II
17%
Vertigo
14%
Inferno
11%
Overpass
10%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
90%
10
18
Nuke
77%
22
3
Mirage
71%
14
7
Dust II
80%
20
6
Vertigo
50%
2
29
Inferno
65%
26
2
Overpass
50%
8
22
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
29
Nuke
50%
20
3
Mirage
50%
8
11
Dust II
63%
8
7
Vertigo
64%
11
3
Inferno
76%
25
5
Overpass
40%
5
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of IHC vs NKT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between IHC and NKT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by IHC. The MVP of this match was bLitz.
IHC analytics
The team IHC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for IHC were bLitz contributed 41 kills and sk0R contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17558 overall damage.
On the defensive side, IHC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NKT analytics
The team NKT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NKT were nin9 contributed 27 kills and dobu contributed 24 kills. 13322 of total damage by NKT could not prevent IHC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NKT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments