0 Comments
63
80
19
-17
267
9:12
13
1
Mirage5.6
0%
103
76
18
+27
404
16:11
27
2
Mirage6.5
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
70%
Vertigo
25%
Nuke
25%
Inferno
23%
Dust II
20%
Mirage
11%
Overpass
5%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
70%
10
0
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Nuke
75%
4
1
Inferno
50%
6
0
Dust II
40%
5
1
Mirage
55%
11
0
Overpass
38%
8
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
6
Vertigo
25%
4
6
Nuke
50%
10
2
Inferno
27%
15
0
Dust II
60%
10
1
Mirage
44%
18
1
Overpass
33%
3
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wwlwl
Info
Match analysis of HOTU vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HOTU and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 32 kills and aVN contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10905 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HOTU analytics
The team HOTU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HOTU were mizu contributed 18 kills and Ruler contributed 15 kills. 7222 of total damage by HOTU could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments