Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
134.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
56.916.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.43.8
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0371
Player score (round)
35831012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
55%
Dust II
44%
Inferno
35%
Vertigo
25%
Ancient
17%
Nuke
15%
Overpass
14%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
55%
11
14
Dust II
0%
1
33
Inferno
71%
14
9
Vertigo
38%
8
8
Ancient
50%
8
13
Nuke
62%
13
3
Overpass
64%
14
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
38
Dust II
44%
16
20
Inferno
36%
14
9
Vertigo
63%
19
5
Ancient
67%
15
4
Nuke
77%
22
0
Overpass
50%
4
18
Info
Match analysis of HEROIC vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HEROIC and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by HEROIC. The MVP of this match was Jabbi.
HEROIC analytics
The team HEROIC secured 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HEROIC were Jabbi contributed 17 kills and sjuush contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8884 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HEROIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were rmn contributed 14 kills and MUTiRiS contributed 12 kills. 5577 of total damage by SAW could not prevent HEROIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments