Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
15.14.6
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
63.616.7
M4A1 kills on a map
164.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
84.716.7
USP kills on a map
31.616
USP damage (avg/round)
13.54.6
Multikill x-
4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
68%
Ancient
33%
Mirage
30%
Inferno
23%
Nuke
18%
Vertigo
11%
Overpass
6%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
28
Ancient
17%
6
13
Mirage
55%
11
10
Inferno
73%
11
4
Nuke
50%
12
4
Vertigo
78%
9
2
Overpass
73%
11
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
68%
25
3
Ancient
50%
12
12
Mirage
25%
4
49
Inferno
50%
20
23
Nuke
68%
22
9
Vertigo
67%
12
19
Overpass
67%
15
13
Info
Match analysis of HEROIC vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HEROIC and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by HEROIC. The MVP of this match was stavn.
HEROIC analytics
The team HEROIC secured 32 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HEROIC were stavn contributed 44 kills and refrezh contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17830 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HEROIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 14 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 49 kills and brnz4n contributed 24 kills. 15117 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent HEROIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments