Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Deagle kills on a map
51.6427
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4516
Percentage of headshots
42%16%
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
M4A1 kills on a map
74.3478
Trades on a map
6.453.3972
Headshots on a map
12.90.318
Headshots on a map
150.318
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
58%
Mirage
52%
Vertigo
47%
Dust II
34%
Anubis
13%
Ancient
11%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
67%
27
0
Mirage
52%
25
3
Vertigo
0%
0
11
Dust II
25%
8
5
Anubis
30%
20
3
Ancient
29%
34
0
Inferno
40%
10
4
Last 5 maps
Nuke
9%
11
2
Mirage
0%
1
5
Vertigo
47%
17
0
Dust II
59%
22
0
Anubis
43%
37
0
Ancient
18%
22
3
Inferno
37%
19
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Heimo vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Heimo and ADEPTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Dust II, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was SBT.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were SBT contributed 46 kills and Chuckyy contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23813 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Heimo were arvid contributed 42 kills and Spargo contributed 45 kills. 21692 of total damage by Heimo could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Heimo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments