Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
93.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
4212.7
AK47 kills on a map
166.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
61.625.3
HE damage (avg/round)
13.73.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:29s00:39s
USP damage (avg/round)
17.24.6
Player score (round)
41361012
Damage (total/round)
40873
Player score (round)
43591012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
58%
Dust II
48%
Nuke
38%
Ancient
20%
Vertigo
13%
Overpass
8%
Mirage
7%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
75%
4
8
Dust II
77%
13
0
Nuke
38%
8
3
Ancient
40%
5
3
Vertigo
20%
5
15
Overpass
36%
11
2
Mirage
33%
6
9
Last 5 maps
Inferno
17%
6
11
Dust II
29%
7
3
Nuke
0%
1
18
Ancient
20%
5
0
Vertigo
33%
9
3
Overpass
44%
9
5
Mirage
40%
10
2
Info
Match analysis of HAVU vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between HAVU and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was xseveN.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 35 out of 69 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 51 kills and chelo contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24936 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 34 out of 69 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were xseveN contributed 57 kills and Aerial contributed 44 kills. 25360 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments