0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
31.6427
USP kills on a map
31.5986
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Deagle kills on a map
31.6427
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Player score (round)
37341010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
62%
Dust II
47%
Nuke
16%
Mirage
12%
Ancient
9%
Anubis
6%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
1
Dust II
0%
0
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Ancient
30%
10
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
62%
13
21
Dust II
47%
45
4
Nuke
49%
41
0
Mirage
38%
39
6
Ancient
39%
44
6
Anubis
39%
44
12
Vertigo
0%
0
33
Info
Match analysis of Haspers vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Haspers and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Nexus. The MVP of this match was ragga.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nexus were ragga contributed 18 kills and XELLOW contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7535 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nexus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Haspers analytics
The team Haspers managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Haspers were bajmi contributed 15 kills and Melavi contributed 13 kills. 6072 of total damage by Haspers could not prevent Nexus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Haspers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments