0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
14826.2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:21s00:05s
Rounds win streak
113
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:25s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
58%
Ancient
14%
Mirage
13%
Vertigo
11%
Dust II
7%
Inferno
4%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
58%
12
6
Ancient
55%
31
2
Mirage
65%
17
3
Vertigo
0%
0
19
Dust II
67%
15
2
Inferno
46%
13
2
Anubis
39%
23
7
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
6
Ancient
41%
32
0
Mirage
52%
21
0
Vertigo
11%
9
0
Dust II
60%
5
0
Inferno
50%
8
4
Anubis
42%
24
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of GUN5 vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GUN5 and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by NOM. The MVP of this match was FinigaN.
NOM analytics
The team NOM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NOM were Zax1e contributed 48 kills and MOREE contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25093 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NOM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were FinigaN contributed 60 kills and tN1R contributed 48 kills. 25660 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent NOM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments