0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
61.8171
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Player score (round)
40891011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Trades on a map
12.483.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
44573
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
38%
Nuke
33%
Vertigo
25%
Ancient
8%
Mirage
1%
Dust II
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
0
Nuke
33%
3
5
Vertigo
0%
0
8
Ancient
33%
15
3
Mirage
57%
7
1
Dust II
100%
2
0
Anubis
50%
12
3
Last 5 maps
Inferno
38%
8
4
Nuke
0%
1
10
Vertigo
25%
12
3
Ancient
41%
32
0
Mirage
56%
27
0
Dust II
100%
2
0
Anubis
50%
22
3
Info
Match analysis of GUN5 vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GUN5 and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by GUN5. The MVP of this match was FinigaN.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 secured 26 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GUN5 were FinigaN contributed 34 kills and tN1R contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15586 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GUN5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 15 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 31 kills and meztal contributed 24 kills. 13545 of total damage by NOM could not prevent GUN5 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments