0 Comments
72
54
19
+18
397
11:8
19
0
+13%
54
72
16
-18
325
8:11
12
0
-15%
Teams advantage Mirage (M2)
Records Mirage
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:26s
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
20.34.7
M4A1 kills on a map
94.491
AWP damage (avg/round)
59.221.7
Headshots on a map
15.960.3141
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Info
Map Analysis of Guild Eagles vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Guild Eagles on Mirage Analysis
Guild Eagles demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Guild Eagles on Mirage were juanflatroo, who contributed 21 kills, and rigoN, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 7540 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Guild Eagles held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Mirage included nEMANHA, who contributed 19 kills, and brutmonster, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6180 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Guild Eagles from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments