0 Comments
79
55
21
+24
412
8:9
22
2
+18%
54
80
17
-26
328
10:9
10
2
-17%
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:26s
HE damage (avg/round)
11.23.4
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
HE damage (avg/round)
183.4
Player score (round)
35561011
Player score (round)
35661011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Info
Map Analysis of Guild Eagles vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Guild Eagles on Inferno Analysis
Guild Eagles demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Guild Eagles on Inferno were gxx-, who contributed 20 kills, and juanflatroo, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8239 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Guild Eagles held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included nEMANHA, who contributed 12 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6563 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Guild Eagles from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments