0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.5
5.8
Nuke0.7
Win Rounds
16
12
Nuke4
Kills
106
91
Nuke15
Damage
11.74K
10.15K
Nuke1593
Economy
597.5K
616.15K
Nuke-18650
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
G
80%
Train
G
67%
Nuke
G
59%
Inferno
G
50%
Mirage
G
30%
Ancient
G
6%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
10
5
Train
67%
3
8
Nuke
79%
14
1
Inferno
50%
2
14
Mirage
75%
12
5
Ancient
64%
14
7
Anubis
67%
3
19
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
5
7
Train
0%
1
11
Nuke
20%
10
6
Inferno
0%
1
13
Mirage
45%
11
0
Ancient
58%
12
2
Anubis
67%
9
6
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of Getting Info vs Akimbo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Getting Info and Akimbo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Getting Info. The MVP of this match was MarKE.
Getting Info analytics
The team Getting Info secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Getting Info were MarKE contributed 28 kills and dea contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11743 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Getting Info held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Akimbo analytics
The team Akimbo managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Akimbo were N20AmZ contributed 20 kills and obi contributed 22 kills. 10150 of total damage by Akimbo could not prevent Getting Info from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Akimbo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments