0 Comments
Teams advantage Mirage (M0)
Records Mirage
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
M
59%
Overpass
54%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
M
50%
Inferno
35%
Mirage
M
1%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
41%
17
23
Overpass
54%
28
11
Vertigo
50%
22
12
Ancient
50%
30
7
Inferno
35%
26
23
Mirage
66%
35
2
Dust II
0%
1
63
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Ancient
100%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
2
Mirage
67%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lww
Info
Map Analysis of GamerLegion vs MONKE by the Bo3.gg Team
GamerLegion on Mirage Analysis
GamerLegion demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GamerLegion on Mirage were iM, who contributed 21 kills, and Zero, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 9448 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, GamerLegion held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
MONKE on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for MONKE, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for MONKE on Mirage included KEi, who contributed 17 kills, and Snax, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6856 total damage, MONKE couldn't prevent GamerLegion from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, MONKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments