0 Comments
71
41
22
+30
466
11:5
15
2
Inferno7.3
+28%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
Assists on a map
8.964.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Player score (round)
35191011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
60%
Ancient
20%
Anubis
13%
Dust II
10%
Inferno
8%
Vertigo
7%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
40%
10
1
Ancient
47%
19
2
Anubis
43%
23
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
78%
9
1
Vertigo
47%
19
0
Nuke
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
3
Ancient
67%
9
0
Anubis
30%
10
2
Dust II
60%
5
0
Inferno
86%
7
0
Vertigo
40%
5
1
Nuke
0%
0
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of GL Academy vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GL Academy and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by kONO. The MVP of this match was Polbandana.
kONO analytics
The team kONO secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for kONO were Polbandana contributed 18 kills and amster contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7459 overall damage.
On the defensive side, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GL Academy analytics
The team GL Academy managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GL Academy were Darber contributed 12 kills and rud contributed 10 kills. 4706 of total damage by GL Academy could not prevent kONO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GL Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments