0 Comments
71
41
22
+30
466
11:5
15
2
+28%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
60%
Ancient
20%
Anubis
13%
Dust II
10%
Inferno
8%
Vertigo
7%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
40%
10
1
Ancient
47%
19
2
Anubis
43%
23
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
78%
9
1
Vertigo
47%
19
0
Nuke
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
3
Ancient
67%
9
0
Anubis
30%
10
2
Dust II
60%
5
0
Inferno
86%
7
0
Vertigo
40%
5
1
Nuke
0%
0
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- wllll
Info
Map Analysis of GL Academy vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
kONO on Inferno Analysis
kONO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for kONO on Inferno were Polbandana, who contributed 18 kills, and amster, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7459 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GL Academy on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GL Academy, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GL Academy on Inferno included Darber, who contributed 12 kills, and rud, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4706 total damage, GL Academy couldn't prevent kONO from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, GL Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments