0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6074
AK47 kills on a map
206.5888
Assists on a map
10.074.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
78%
Nuke
60%
Mirage
40%
Vertigo
39%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
24%
Anubis
15%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
78%
9
1
Nuke
0%
0
5
Mirage
40%
10
2
Vertigo
39%
23
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
47%
19
2
Anubis
48%
29
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
60%
5
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
71%
7
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- lwwwl
Info
Match analysis of GL Academy vs ARROW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between GL Academy and ARROW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by GL Academy. The MVP of this match was Darber.
GL Academy analytics
The team GL Academy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GL Academy were Darber contributed 23 kills and Tree contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7834 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GL Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARROW analytics
The team ARROW managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARROW were Kre1N contributed 9 kills and Orbit contributed 6 kills. 5469 of total damage by ARROW could not prevent GL Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARROW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments