0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
78%
Nuke
60%
Mirage
40%
Vertigo
39%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
24%
Anubis
15%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
78%
9
1
Nuke
0%
0
5
Mirage
40%
10
2
Vertigo
39%
23
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Ancient
47%
19
2
Anubis
48%
29
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
60%
5
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
71%
7
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- lwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of GL Academy vs ARROW by the Bo3.gg Team
GL Academy on Anubis Analysis
GL Academy demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GL Academy on Anubis were Darber, who contributed 23 kills, and Tree, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7834 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, GL Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ARROW on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ARROW, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ARROW on Anubis included Kre1N, who contributed 9 kills, and Orbit, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5469 total damage, ARROW couldn't prevent GL Academy from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, ARROW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments