Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:05s00:39s
HE kills on a map
21.127
AK47 kills on a map
126.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
73.725.3
USP damage (avg/round)
15.34.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.63.8
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.45.4
Deagle kills on a map
41.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
23.15.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Nuke
56%
Mirage
42%
Overpass
32%
Ancient
13%
Inferno
10%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
91%
22
0
Nuke
0%
0
51
Mirage
80%
25
16
Overpass
73%
15
7
Ancient
56%
9
10
Inferno
60%
20
19
Dust II
67%
24
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
20%
5
41
Nuke
56%
16
5
Mirage
38%
16
19
Overpass
41%
22
7
Ancient
43%
14
15
Inferno
70%
10
13
Dust II
70%
27
1
Info
Match analysis of Gambit vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Gambit and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by Gambit. The MVP of this match was sh1ro.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit secured 32 out of 45 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Mirage. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gambit were sh1ro contributed 42 kills and Ax1Le contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18106 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 13 out of 45 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were ZOREE contributed 27 kills and xseveN contributed 32 kills. 14345 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent Gambit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments