0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
02
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Player score (round)
38901010
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Knife kills
11
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:25s
HE damage (avg/round)
113.4
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
45%
Ancient
28%
Mirage
22%
Vertigo
12%
Inferno
10%
Dust II
5%
Nuke
3%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
77
Ancient
66%
35
13
Mirage
65%
37
8
Vertigo
50%
22
29
Inferno
57%
35
25
Dust II
62%
13
18
Nuke
57%
37
16
Last 5 maps
Anubis
45%
20
15
Ancient
38%
40
21
Mirage
43%
7
51
Vertigo
38%
24
19
Inferno
47%
43
4
Dust II
67%
12
17
Nuke
54%
39
14
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Fluxo vs Galorys by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fluxo and Galorys, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Fluxo. The MVP of this match was Lucaozy.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo were Lucaozy contributed 35 kills and zevy contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16587 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Galorys analytics
The team Galorys managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Galorys were tomate contributed 17 kills and detr0ittJ contributed 19 kills. 15580 of total damage by Galorys could not prevent Fluxo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments