G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

27

20

3

+7

93

12:1

8

0

7.6

+7%

25

23

6

+2

83

4:2

5

0

6.5

+1%

25

26

5

-1

71

5:3

4

0

6.1

+2%

21

24

2

-3

61

2:3

4

0

5.3

+1%

18

21

5

-3

55

3:1

4

0

5.2

-9%

Total

116

114

21

+2

362

26:10

25

0

6.1

+1%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

24

7

0

82

2:3

5

2

6.6

0%

23

23

7

0

75

1:4

4

0

5.9

-1%

23

25

2

-2

55

4:5

5

0

5.5

-15%

22

25

7

-3

70

1:8

6

0

5.4

0%

18

25

7

-7

62

2:6

6

0

5.3

-9%

Total

110

122

30

-12

344

10:26

26

2

5.7

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Inferno Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno were tabseN, who contributed 24 kills, and gade, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12397 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G2 on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for G2, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno included NiKo, who contributed 27 kills, and huNter-, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13025 total damage, G2 couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date